Thursday, September 9, 2010

Vet Visit, still pending

The Dr. was in today, finally. He called me around 3 to let me know he was only running late, not standing me up again. He showed up, I explained that she's been on again off again for a while, and I think I was just chocking it up to her being unbalanced/unfit and young. Well now she's plenty fit and not that unbalanced but still off. So he has me run her up and down, nothing there, we go find a tough spot of ground and sure enough she's way off on her right foot. So we block the navicular. I'm cringing as I send her out to trot around hoping desperately that she's still off... and she is! PHEW! So it's not a navicular thing. We add more carbocaine to block the pastern, trot around, still off. More, to the fetlock, and she's not miraculously better, but much more so. We take like 5 views of her fetlock on x-ray and off he goes to run them through the developer. I won't hear back from him until tomorrow some time, hopefully.

He says it could be that she has a little bit of a lack of cartilage around the joint, or something else, he's not sure what. Hopefully the x-rays show something, because I want to know what it is! I guess I should count myself lucky that I can just slap plain ole front shoes on and have her be sound, but I want to make sure I'm not doing anything to her that I shouldn't.

Also, I don't know if I've mentioned this before, but my little 6 yr old mare has been pin-fired. No one really knows why the race track trainers do this, but they do. I have no clue if this has anything to do with her soreness but ya...

I called the vet today (after not posting this post late last night for some reason which I forget) and he says that her x-rays show.... nothing! I don't know if that is good or bad at this point. The Dr. wants to come back out to do some more lower limb pictures (why he didn't already is beyond me) just to rule out anything down there. Those were the ones I wanted anyway, so yay! Or boo, considering I have to pay for them. Let the diagnostics continue!


  1. Yeesh! poor thing. I hope you figure it out.

  2. I feel like I'm writing a suspense novel or something. To be continued!

  3. on the d60- I love it, I have used a d40 and other than a few changed features it's the same camera. Ps- it's not he camera body that matters, it's the lens. I love my 55-200 lens, thats what I take most of my pictures with. I am able to get up close and personal without actually being up close and personal so my subjects resume doing whatever they were doing without actually having a camera in their business.
    When I get my d90 I think everyone will have to be put on a waiting list LOL. So many people love my camera.

  4. lol, great minds think alike! I knew it was the lens!

  5. Ugh, bet that was a lot of money for not much...